The prime factorization of is , and since it contains and at least one , it must be divisible by .
To analyze the divisibility of by , we must compare their prime factorizations.
Prime factorization of 24: . For a number to be divisible by , its prime factorization must contain at least (which is ) and at least one factor of .
Prime factorization of 216: .
Comparison: The prime factorization of () contains and it contains (which is more than the required single factor of ). Since all the necessary prime factors of are present in the prime factorization of , is divisible by . In fact, .
Analyzing the options:
The statement that the prime factorization of is and that it contains the necessary factors ( and ) is the correct analysis.
The prime factorization is incorrect; it equals , not .
Checking for divisibility by and is explicitly stated as an unreliable test.
While the sum of digits being a multiple of does prove divisibility by , it says nothing about divisibility by , which is also required for divisibility by .
Choose the Correct Option :
The number is divisible by . Which statement correctly analyzes this fact using the prime factorization method?
Hi ,
The prime factorization of is , and since it contains and at least one , it must be divisible by .
To analyze the divisibility of by , we must compare their prime factorizations.
Prime factorization of 24: . For a number to be divisible by , its prime factorization must contain at least (which is ) and at least one factor of .
Prime factorization of 216: .
Comparison: The prime factorization of () contains and it contains (which is more than the required single factor of ). Since all the necessary prime factors of are present in the prime factorization of , is divisible by . In fact, .
Analyzing the options:
The statement that the prime factorization of is and that it contains the necessary factors ( and ) is the correct analysis.
The prime factorization is incorrect; it equals , not .
Checking for divisibility by and is explicitly stated as an unreliable test.
While the sum of digits being a multiple of does prove divisibility by , it says nothing about divisibility by , which is also required for divisibility by .
The prime factorization of is , and since it contains and at least one , it must be divisible by .
To analyze the divisibility of by , we must compare their prime factorizations.
Prime factorization of 24: . For a number to be divisible by , its prime factorization must contain at least (which is ) and at least one factor of .
Prime factorization of 216: .
Comparison: The prime factorization of () contains and it contains (which is more than the required single factor of ). Since all the necessary prime factors of are present in the prime factorization of , is divisible by . In fact, .
Analyzing the options:
The statement that the prime factorization of is and that it contains the necessary factors ( and ) is the correct analysis.
The prime factorization is incorrect; it equals , not .
Checking for divisibility by and is explicitly stated as an unreliable test.
While the sum of digits being a multiple of does prove divisibility by , it says nothing about divisibility by , which is also required for divisibility by .